Shariah: The Threat To America: An Exercise In Competitive Analysis (Report of Team B II) |  | Authors: William J Boykin, Harry Edward Soyster, Henry Cooper, Stephen C. Coughlin, Michael Del Rosso, Frank J. Gaffney Jr., John Guandolo, Clare M. Lopez, Andrew C. McCarthy, Patrick Poole, Joseph E. Schmitz, Tom Trento, J. Michael Waller, Diana West, R. James Woolsey
Creators: Brian Kennedy, James "Ace" Lyons, Christine Brim, David Yerushalmi, David Reaboi
Publisher: Center for Security Policy
Category: Book
List Price: $14.00
Buy New: $11.20
as of 5/23/2012 08:27 CDT details
You Save: $2.80 (20%)
New (14) Used (12) from $5.90
Seller: SuperBookDeals-
Sales Rank: 76,628
Languages: English (Unknown), English (Original Language), English (Published)
Media: Paperback
Pages: 370
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.2
Dimensions (in): 0.6 x 0.9 x 0.1
ISBN: 098229476X
EAN: 9780982294765
ASIN: 098229476X
Publication Date: September 22, 2010
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | ISBN13: 9780982294765 | | • | Condition: New | | • | Notes: BRAND NEW FROM PUBLISHER! 100% Satisfaction Guarantee. Tracking provided on most orders. Buy with Confidence! Millions of books sold! |
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
This study is the result of months of analysis, discussion and drafting by a group of top security policy experts concerned with the preeminent totalitarian threat of our time: the legal-political-military doctrine known within Islam as "shariah." It is designed to provide a comprehensive and articulate "second opinion" on the official characterizations and assessments of this threat as put forth by the United States government. The authors, under the sponsorship of the Center for Security Policy, have modeled this work on an earlier "exercise in competitive analysis" which came to be known as the "Team B" Report. The present Team B II report is based entirely on unclassified, readily available sources. As with the original Team B analysis, however, this study challenges the assumptions underpinning the official line in the conflict with today's totalitarian threat, which is currently euphemistically described as "violent extremism," and the policies of co-existence, accommodation and submission that are rooted in those assumptions.
|
| |
|
|
|
